
John Green is the #1 New York Times bestselling author of Looking for Alaska, An Abundance of Katherines, Paper Towns, The Fault in Our Stars, and Turtles All the Way Down. He is also the coauthor, with David Levithan, of Will Grayson, Will Grayson. He was the 2006 recipient of the Michael L. Printz Award, a 2009 Edgar Award winner, and has twice been a finalist for the Los Angeles Times Book Prize. Green's books have been published in more than 55 languages and over 24 million copies are in print. Josh Schwartz, American screenwriter and television producer, is responsible for adapting the beloved Looking for Alaska for TV. Schwartz is best known for creating and executive producing the Fox teen drama series The O.C., for developing The CW's series Gossip Girl based on the book of the same name, and for co-creating NBC's Chuck.

after. Nothing is ever the same.
When I first read Looking for Alaska, I was way too young to appreciate the full complexity of the novel. Which, you know, can happen if you read a book at the wrong time in your life. I'd always wanted to get back to it, hoping that I'd get it when I was older. When I saw that Looking for Alaska got a tv-series on Hulu of the same name, I knew it was time. Like with what I did for The Lovely Bones, this review is a book-to-tv series adaptation review. Below, I'll be breaking down each episode of the 8-episode series, comparing the book and the adaptation, and deciding what I liked about the adaptation and what I didn't.
"Famous Last Words" (Episode 1)
We open on the scene of an accident, full of cigarettes, rain, and police lights. For those who've read the book, we know what this scene captures. This is the scene that, for the entire novel, we're working our way towards. I liked this as the opening scene, vs. Miles's cringe-worthy going away party, because it sets a somber tone for the story. The producers don't make this story anything that it's not, and they show you that with just the opening scene.
That being said, Miles's going away party is absolutely cringey, all the way down to the shots of the food that we know will all go uneaten (remember this for later!).

The way the tv-series plays with time and shows the passage of it is interesting too. The passage of time is lesser known in the tv-series, and yet I feel like there's more intrigue surrounding it. This is most likely due to the fact that we have two mysteries set up straight from the get go: who ratted on Paul and Marya? and what happened in that opening scene?
Miles and Alaska were set up as polar opposites from the start. The difference in their home situations and the parallel yet separate car ride experiences show us how different they are from the beginning. So, when they get that first look (Miles in the car, Alaska outside her car), it's really interesting that that's the first spot their paths cross. And, of course, that they have that first look at each other when surrounded by vehicles.
As I was watching this first episode, I took a note that read: "So far, very close to the book and follows the most minute details, I'm very in love with this adaptation." It is true: the tv-series closely mirrors the book. They have all the details down to Miles's world map and the shitty shower. Chip's opening lines are pulled exactly from the book, and so are Miles's when he first meets Chip. The casting of Miles and Chip was perfect, and I was a little bit in love with the Colonel as he delivered those opening lines and welcomed Miles into Culver Creek. All of the actors were incredible at bringing the characters to life. All of the pull quotes used in the first episode were well chosen and well delivered. The lines that also aren't from the book match the characters well, and add to the plot and to our understanding of their backgrounds.
The other imagery that I paid attention to was the daisy imagery, and the swan imagery. The swan was seen in the opening credits of this episode, and harkens back to the idea that "the dangerous ones always are [beautiful]." The daisy is heartbreaking, and something that will need to be remembered later on in the series. It was smart to open with some of these images, especially because they're very foreshadowing of what's to come, but also forgettable if you're not paying attention.
Overall, the first episode of the tv-series was spot-on. The phone call at the end pulls Miles's Great Perhaps back into the equation, and soon we will see where that takes him.
"Tell Them I Said Something ..." (Episode 2)
We don't know that everything in this episode happens 84 days before until the end of the episode. Time has less and more of a presence, which I tried addressing above, but will do so in more detail here. Each scene in the beginning of the book is titled as "x days before" which means that each scene is saturated with our wanting to know before what? Time is basically a character in that sense, but we are almost so desensitized by it, since there are so many of those headings. In the tv series, they only tell us how many days before at the end of the episode. In that way, we are also forgetting that we're working our way towards something. But, when that header flashes on, we get anxious again, because we know we must be working towards the scene of that car accident. This countdown is one of the more genius parts of Looking for Alaska, in my opinion. In the book, we know something's coming, but we don't know what, or why it's important. And once we get there, there's no going back.

In the first episode, Alaska doesn't grab Miles's hand when she technically does in the book, but she does in this episode. As they're fleeing the scene of the crime, she reaches for him and he speeds up. I felt that this had more symbolism than just the "Run run run run" moment in the novel. Setting is important, and the fact that they were fleeing the scene of a prank, which could have been a crime, aligns with what we need to know about Alaska in this moment.

"I've Never Felt Better ..." (Episode 3)
The thread of secrets and lies is strong within this episode, making it one of my favorites of the whole miniseries. There are moments where the show deviates from the book here, but in ways that makes the tv show stronger, and possibly more real for viewers.


When Miles spots Alaska at Coosa's, it's a movie moment, in my opinion. There's a beautiful parallel there, that that's where he first spotted her, when he first sort of felt that curiosity towards her. And she's sitting there again, broken and yet Miles can't see that.

And, my last note is that it's important that we got to see the conversation between the Eagle and Alaska. We get to see what's fully at stake for Alaska in this moment, which is something we don't understand exclusively through Miles's point of view in the novel. In fact, a lot of what's portrayed in the tv series wouldn't be possible in the novel, but it's important to our understanding of the complexities of the story. The novel has a limited scope, whereas in the tv series, we can stop and explore what Alaska must have been feeling in that moment. It's absolutely perfect, because we start seeing the beginning of the end.
"The Nourishment is Palatable" (Episode 4)
Alaska ratted, violating the one true stipulation of the honor code. This is important to understand throughout this episode, because a lot of the conversation (or lack of it) revolves around this central fact.

Communication is key in this episode, or at least understand who's talking to who about what. The fact that Alaska didn't tell her friends that she broke up with her boyfriend is a bit funny, but also worrisome. It goes to show how alone she really is, and how desperate she is for company. The fact that the Colonel makes an exception for Alaska on Thanksgiving but kicks her out of the car goes to show how stubborn he truly is. The fact that the relationships get rocky here--in episode 4, halfway through the series--is notable. We're also so much closer to the accident, so tense relationships adds to viewer anxiety about what's going to happen.
The turn of events that causes Miles to stay at Culver Creek for Thanksgiving is a bit different than in the book, but ultimately just as realistic. I enjoy how Thanksgiving break is a way for Miles to come to terms with what he really wants of Alaska: to get to know her better. He does more to try and understand Alaska and her suffering more than he does in the book. In a way, I think this will add to his guilt later, but also makes him a more likable and less passive character, without taking away any of the complexity of the novel itself.
Thanksgiving is tense. There's a greater emphasis on the Colonel's anger and unrelenting attitude towards Alaska. There's a greater emphasis on the romantic and personal stakes between Miles and Alaska. There's also the contrast between Hyde's Thanksgiving and the kids' Thanksgiving that is stark and sad. Overall, the emphasis on the holiday is important to remember, because it is the last one. The choices they make during this week are haunting, from the invitations to dinner all the way up to being kicked out of the car. (*Kicked out of the car* is important as well.)

"I'll Show You That It Won't Shoot" (Episode 5)
We are now more than halfway through the miniseries, and fans of Looking for Alaska know what's coming next.
My notes get more and more sparse from here on out, because I was truly engrossed with how the producers and actors brought this second half of the series to life. If you continue reading from here on down without having watched the show or read the book, there will be spoilers. You have been warned.
The addition of the boys hating Alaska will most likely add to their feeling of guilt later on, after Alaska dies. I felt like that hate reflected their firm belief in their honor code, but it would also explain why they try so hard to move the blame off of their shoulders. The actors did a fantastic job with that anger and disbelief, because when I was watching the show, I just knew how guilty they'd be in the later episodes. And I was right.

One of my favorite parts about this episode is that Hyde's lessons don't always take the form of classroom lessons. He teaches Miles at every turn, in every conversation. This makes Hyde a more dynamic character, and one that affects more than just Miles's character. Even though his lessons go a bit out of order, they were deliberately placed, and in fact allow us to recall them as the series goes on. Overall, a fabulous choice in making Hyde a bigger character, and giving him the dimension needed to show viewers why he's such an influential role model.

"We Are All Going" (Episode 6)

And then, the passage of time. "1 day before" we are told, which is a complete break in form from previous episodes. That's how we know that a) this is the last day before the accident and that b) this accident is inevitable. At first, it feels like it could have been avoided, but we still have worked up to exactly what we're supposed to have worked up to. It's nerve-racking, to be quite frank.

There are a few blasé mentions of death in this episode, along with Alaska's turning in of her paper. My question for this moment is, did she turn it in early? That would help us understand if the accident was an accident or not.
The flashback to the Colonel's and Alaska's first meeting is also interesting to note, because it's our second flashback in the whole series, and both are contained within this episode. Again, if we weren't tipped off that something was going to happen, this choice would certainly make us nervous. If not for the Colonel, then for Alaska too, because those two characters were involved in the two flashbacks.
But then, we see a flash-forward when Miles and Alaska are talking. Where will she be in ten years? I don't think I need to write explicitly about why this is so heartbreaking.
The one thing that's interesting to note is that Miles asks if Alaska is okay to drive at the end of the episode. He does not do that in the novel. The Colonel asks Alaska, "Are you sure you're okay?" in reference to the fact that she's obviously upset about something, but they both let her go. I can't figure out why Miles has the line to ask if she's okay to drive. It's pretty clear that they don't do that in the novel, for specific reasons that add to their feeling of guilt later on. Either way, this is the most noteworthy deviation from the novel that almost (almost) messes with the meaning of book. Since it's such a small thing, though, it will most likely go unnoticed by those without explicit knowledge of the book.
And then, the accident.
"Now Comes the Mystery" (Episode 7)
The grief in this episode is fantastically portrayed, and I admit to shedding a tear or two. Seeing Chip and the Eagle hug was heart-wrenching, and seeing the Eagle grieve is such an important angle to explore. Everyone is blaming themselves: Miles, the Colonel, Takumi. I think it's important to see (and probably accurate, too) how the Eagle would blame himself in this scenario.
I enjoyed the passage of time as Miles and the Colonel grieved. The shots of the Colonel just walking to nowhere were so powerful, as well as Miles's literal inability to move or to dedicate himself to something other than mind-numbing video games. When the day of the funeral approached, Miles going to Hyde for a tie was also a powerful addition. We got to flashback to Hyde's loss of love (if you're counting, this is the third flashback, but the fourth "flash"). In a way, we saw the parallel of that loss and grief. It went to show that Hyde understood Miles, in a way that I think Miles needed in that moment.
The flash of food at the funeral is like the flash of food at the beginning, at Miles's failed going away party. The beginning in contrast with the beginning of the end. This was what his Great Perhaps was looking like: exactly like his failed going away. There are a lot of conclusions and parallels to these moments that I could probably take a whole other blog post to recognize, but I do want to say this. Anytime food is brought up, it's important, especially in the context of gathering. The fact that the sad and failed gathering at the beginning is reflective of the large and sad gathering at the end says something about the gathering of people and role food plays in that. I'll digress for now.
One of my favorite additions overall to the series was how the Colonel verbally assaulted Alaska's dad at the funeral. In the book, we do see that Miles directs some of his anger towards Mr. Young, but seeing it play out on the screen is intense in a way that captures how anger and grief play off of one another. This also allows us to see the role Mr. Young played (or didn't play) in Alaska's life, and how yet another person in this series blames themselves for the loss of Alaska. Beautifully done.

Being able to see the phone call and understand the dynamics behind it were important in building up towards the end of the series, and to building the desire for answers. This desire takes full bloom in the last episode, but Jake's presence at the funeral fosters it in a more organic and believable way.
"It's Very Beautiful Over There" (Episode 8)
Firstly, Takumi gets to participate in the hunt for answers. Near the end of the novel, Takumi kind of fades away, and he feels left out as Miles and the Colonel search for answers. The tv series eliminates this by having Takumi participate with Miles and the Colonel up to the end. This also gets rid of Takumi's guilt, in having seen her the last night. As far as the tv series is concerned, Takumi never saw Alaska that last night, rushing to her car, and thus doesn't have the same level of guilt the Colonel and Miles do. That was an interesting choice, because they could have allowed Takumi to be more involved with the Colonel's and Miles's schemes while also carrying that secret, but the secret also doesn't exist. The alleviates the guilt off Takumi's shoulders (which i am not a fan of), but it also allows Takumi's whereabouts to be known at the end of the series (which I am a fan of). This is a change that has a sort of give-and-take nature. Although, I can say that I think tv show Takumi not having this secret makes sense based on the character of tv show Takumi. Not that tv show Takumi and novel Takumi are that much different, but I feel like this decision was made without regard for novel Takumi.




Some Questions I Asked Myself (and their answers)
Did the actors meet expectations and match the characters? Yes! I believe not only were the actors cast well to look the part, but they also acted the part. They did great in bringing my favorite lines, scenes, and facial expressions to life.
Did the book plot and the tv-series plot match? Yes and no. The overarching plot was the same, but there were some storylines and additions to the show that made the tv-series more enjoyable and complex.
Was there any major changes that worked well? My favorite "major changes" would have been the addition of the debutante ball, and the Colonel's blowing up at Alaska's dad. Both additions highlighted the moral complexities of the characters, the guilt the characters carried, and were punches to the gut that weren't in the book. Those two scenes would have to be my favorite major changes.
Was there any major changes that didn't work well? I actually didn't see any changes that didn't work well. All the additions (or retractions) of moments worked well in the show. Most of the changes that I noted were additions, and all of them helped further highlight and expose the complexity of the book.
What was my favorite moment? I feel like I mentioned a few of my favorite moments above in my summary, but here's one that I didn't have the chance to mention. At Alaska's funeral, the mourners are to press their fingertips to Alaska's coffin--something about how they are leaving their fingertips on her, as much as she left fingertips on all their lives. When Miles reaches the front of the line and goes to press his fingertips to the coffin, he breaks down and tells Alaska that he loves her. His facial expression when he breaks down is so heartbreaking, in a way I don't truly have words for. This is one of the moments that caused me to cry, because I really felt Miles's grief in that moment.
So What's the Verdict?
Where does all of this leave us? What's the verdict? Book, or tv series, or both, or neither?

The miniseries is a work of art, in my opinion. It captures everything from those broad feelings of fascination and guilt, and the smallest details like the plastic daisies and the awful shower. The tv series captured the small brilliances of the novel in a way that meant that those things didn't go over my head. In the book, I was frustrated by Miles's solitary view of Alaska's character. But because in the show we have a wider range of point of views, I felt like I was able to understand the complexities behind Alaska's, Miles's, the Colonel's, Takumi's and everyone else's character. I loved our ability to explore the grief visually, using the same words as the text. In the end, there was a lot more story in the tv series that made the complexities of the novel more compelling.
I think you know where this is going.
I will always be an advocate for reading the book first, because it makes the "bringing the story to life" part of the show so much more exciting. But I know, that if I were to ever engage with the story of Looking for Alaska again, I would watch the tv series. There's so much it does right, while also making the story bigger than the text it was born from.
Let me know your opinion in the comments below. Do you agree, or disagree? And why? And thanks for coming along for the ride!
For more information about the text of Looking for Alaska, visit John Green's FAQ page! I found this to be an amazing resource as I read the book, because he helps articulate the complexities I was noting.
*Part of this review is also posted on my Goodreads page*
Comments
Post a Comment